Movie Review: Transformers 2

TRANSFORMERS: REVENGE OF THE FALLEN
Main Players: Shia LaBeouf, Megan Fox, Bumblebee, Optimus Prime, Megatron, et al.
Calling the shots: Michael Bay
What's it about? Decepticon forces return to Earth on a mission to take Sam Witwicky (LaBeouf) prisoner, after the young hero learns the truth about the ancient origins of the Transformers. – from imdb.com

What did I think? ~Transformers, robots in disguise. Transformers, more than meets the eyes!~ C’mon, sing it with me. Who didn’t see the first one? And who wasn’t looking forward to this one?

This second installment is the first’s bigger, dumber and more expensive degenerate brother. It’ll entertain you through out the whole 2 hours and a half. It’s your quintessential Blockbuster movie. It’s everything you’d expect from a big, dumb, Hollywood action movie and it’s great!

It is however not the smartest movie you’ll ever see. I missed the first five or so minutes of, what I’ve later been informed as, jibber-jabber and it pretty much ends in the same manner. It’s almost like Michael Bay decided that scripts weren’t necessary and just used most of the budget on explosions and CG. The final face off between the über amped-up Optimus and The Fallen ends quicker than it took Optimus to amp-up. Though by that stage you’re so over all the explosions and robots fighting, you just want to get out and go to the bathroom.

There’s also the sappy factor that I’m not a big fan of. The whole “Don’t leave me, I need you” thing. As touching as that might have been under “real” circumstances, it feels sooooooo out of place in this movie. Not to mention that it’s not exactly carried out by the most talented actors. In fact, the humans in this film are almost irrelevant and play completely to stereotype. See Tyrese spurting out token black guy lines like “We’re about to get our asses KICKED!” and…“Damn!” (Okay the last one I just threw in, not sure if he actually said it but it wouldn’t surprise me).

Did anyone else think the sound was a little off? The explosions and action scenes should have literally “blown us away” but it didn’t have that “umph” that it should have. Also when that old ass robot started talking, I couldn’t understand half of what was being said (and why did he have an accent?) No? No body else felt that?

It also tried a little too hard to be funny. The robo-twins got annoying, the mum high on “special” brownies, the annoying roommate and the know-it-all from the first one (the one played by John Turturro). Or lines like, “do you need a tighter shirt?” “There isn’t a tighter one, we looked.” Now, some of it was genuinely funny but most got overused.

Other than that it is very entertaining and the seamless integration of humans and robots using CG is something to behold. It is actually quite amazing. It’s the type of movie that movies were invented for; A blockbuster that lets your imaginations appear on screen. Between the robots, explosions and Megan Fox (every girl paints bikes like that, right?): it’ll tickle the little boy in all of us. (That didn’t sound right, and no disrespect to the recently deceased MJ. Rest In Peace.)

65%

Movie Review: The Unborn

THE UNBORN
Main Players: Odette Yustman, Gary Oldman, Meagan Good, et al.
Calling the shots: David S. Goyer
Running time: 87mins
What's it about? A young woman (Yustman) fights the spirit that is slowly taking possession of her. – from imdb.com

What did I think? Welcome to our generation; a generation where horror movies go for jump scares and creepy/gross images to scare rather than with a spine-tingling plotline or tense set pieces. This movie is another in a long line of horror movies that doesn’t quite get the job done…it probably even goes beyond that, because this, really is not even worth your time and more importantly money.

Horror fans might get a kick out of the latest from Platinum Dunes, company responsible for the recent spat of remakes (such as The Texas Chainsaw Massacre), with their first original effort. Apparently kids are still creep little bastards and it is more important to get you to keep jumping out of your seats with loud, sudden noises/music rather than create a story that has any kind of coherence to it.

It is particularly disappointing given that it’s coming from David S. Goyer, who did a so-so job with some of the Blade series and a excellent job in having a had in the new Batman movies. I guess one thing doesn’t relate to the other because this is complete and utter rubbish. Some of the things are quite laughable. Are we meant to be scared when we see a dog with a mask on? Or a glove on the street?

It’s probably a good thing the cast is mainly no-names and or up-and-comers. Odette Yustman (last seen in Cloverfield) is hot, but really doesn’t need to do much but put on contacts and act scared. You see a veteran like Gary Oldman in there and you can’t help but think that he was just bored and needed his quick buck because it’s not really something you want your name against.

This is a really dumb movie. You are constantly wondering “wtf” and most of the jump scares I mentioned early are so obvious you have to not be paying attention to actually jump. If I sound bitter, it’s because I am. I don’t know what it is about horror movies, but I just like them. I know they are going to be bad, but I can never stay away. Then I wish I’d stayed away…

10%

Movie Review: W.

W.
Main Players: Josh Brolin, Elizabeth Banks, James Cromwell, et al.
Calling the shots: Oliver Stone
Running time: 129mins
What's it about? A chronicle on the life and presidency of George W. Bush. - from imdb.com

What did I think? What a shame. There are so many things going for this film, it is such a shame that it is what it is. It is the most boring-interesting movie I have seen in a long time. Some of the performances are mighty impressive and other not so. We are all interested in the presidency that was Dubya, but this movie doesn’t do anything to shed any light on it.

First the good parts I suppose. Josh Brolin (possibly one of my fave actors at the moment) is spot on as Dubya. His mannerisms and speech patterns are so perfect, you forget that he’s not really Bush. He essentially looks like him, without looking like him. He is ably supported by an impressive cast, some of whom do better (Cromwell, Burstyn, Glenn, Dreyfuss, Jones, Banks) than others (Newton, Wright, Gruffudd).

The problem lies in the structure and plot. Apparently this movie was churned out really quickly, in time for the US elections last year, and because of that it seems like it came out of the oven too early. Oliver Stone’s movies are often hit and miss, but when it is something about the US, he usually has a lot to say. Not so in this one, we leave the theatre wondering what the point was.

As if to emphasis that point, all of Bush’s Bushisms are in this movie but not at times when he actually said them. We hear the “misunderestimated me” line as well as the “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice…we can’t get fooled again!” line. We also see his pretzel choking incident. But it’s almost like it’s in there for the sake of being in there. Not for the story.

That’s the other issue. We see flashbacks to his earlier days that doesn’t seem to make all that much sense in the scheme of things, except to show that he was essentially a drunken Texan. It would have been better had it come a little later, and if the movie had concentrated more on his presidency. As it is at the moment, it’s rather disappointing.

40%

Movie Review: The Reader

THE READER
Main Players: Ralph Fiennes, David Kross, Kate Winslet, et al.
Calling the shots: Stephen Daldry
Running time: 124mins
What's it about? Post-WWII Germany: Nearly a decade after his affair with an older woman came to a mysterious end, law student Michael Berg (Kross/Fiennes) re-encounters his former lover as she defends herself in a war-crime trial. - from imdb.com

What did I think? As with anything else that’s overhyped or talked about too much, this movie was a bit of disappointment. So much so that, I’m not even sure that it deserved its Oscar nomination as a Best Picture or Best Director movie. Kate Winslet’s break through win was well deserved but it can also be argued that her role was that of a Supporting Actress not a Leading one.

It’s not that it’s a terrible movie. It’s far from that actually. It’s well directed and the storytelling is done fairly well. The performances or rather “the” performance of Kate Winslet is what might elevate this movie to that higher echelon. The problem is it doesn’t grab your attention like it should. The story is compelling enough; it just takes a long time to get there.

The first half of the movie is extremely draggy. It’s essentially softcore porn and slight romance between the Hanna and Michael which is important in itself, but unnecessarily overly long. It is only when we begin the trial of the war-crimes that she is accused of that it even gets interesting. Even when that arrives though, you are not as emotionally connected to either character because of what’s happened before hand.

You’re more curious about whether she actually did it and whether she is in the wrong or not. Then the movie throws you a major revelation that proves to be the movies “wow” moment. And from there it suddenly picks up steam and becomes increasingly interesting and intriguing, but it all comes too late as before you know it, it’s over.

It’s an extremely interesting subject matter and important in terms of our history, but this movie is too laggy for it to be considered a great film. First half is too slow paced, though it may be important in the scope of things, and because of it, it doesn’t get interesting until well into the second and third act. By that time, you’re pretty much over it and are basically enjoying Kate’s handy work.

50%

Movie Review: He's Just Not That Into You

HE’S JUST NOT THAT INTO YOU
Main Players: Ginnifer Goodwin, Justin Long, Jennifer Aniston, et al.
Calling the shots: Ken Kwapis
Running time: 129mins
What's it about? The Baltimore-set movie of interconnecting story arcs deals with the challenges of reading and misreading human behaviour. - from imdb.com

What did I think? Here’s your first contender for chick flick/romcom/date movie of the year and boy is it drawing the, mostly female, crowd. It’s not really hard to see why. It might not be the most original movie you’ll see, but it has enough moments in this film for you to enjoy; some funny, some cute and some emotional and touching.

Those that know me, know that I’m a bit girly at times and do love my chick flicks; so needless to say I did enjoy this one. The ensemble cast and interconnecting storylines work well for this movie and has a feel like Love Actually. The connections between characters are not all that surprising but the crowd seemed to think it was. They were gasping in unison and there were several “aww”s as well. There are a lot of characters and stories introduced, but it is delivered very well.

The cast is most definitely impressive. And because of the numbers involved, not all of them get their share of screen time. But each of them leave the required impression and you watch each story caring about what happens because of it. I’ve listed Ginnifer Goodwin and Justin Long first because they seemed to have the central story (and because they bothered to visit Australia) but you could argue otherwise.

The stories themselves, as mentioned, aren’t all that new. A naïve girl looking for her true love, married man tempted by a hot new encounter, a world-wise man getting his own, etc. etc. You’ll have your favourite stories and characters and that’s the beauty of this one. All of it is also very “true” apparently and makes it all the more relatable in some aspects.

In the end you might be dragged along by your significant other, or go with a group of friends, or see it because there’s nothing else, you’ll still enjoy it if you take it for what it is. As I said, it’s cute and touching at the end. If you want any more of reason to see it, it made Ben Affleck likeable. I usually hate him in movies but he’s so gosh darn hard to hate.

60%

Movie Review: The International

THE INTERNATIONAL
Main Players: Clive Owen, Naomi Watts, Armin Mueller-Stahl, et al.
Calling the shots: Tom Tykwer
Running time: 118mins
What's it about? An Interpol agent (Owen) attempts to expose a high-profile financial institution’s role in an international arms dealing ring. - from imdb.com

What did I think? Sigh. This movie is like watching a family member perform in front of everyone and though they may think they are hot shit, they really aren’t. From the outset of this movie, it tries to be a Bond/Bourne type movie with international locations, a kinetic paced and intense music and some decent action but that’s all it does; tries.

The movie starts all of a sudden and at first it’s a little hard to keep track of what exactly is going on. And because it tries to be the said type of movie, it actually deters it from making any sense for a while. When it starts to flatten out become coherent enough, it begins to lag. You really do feel the full blunt of its running time and by the end if its uneventful climax, you are bored out of your mind.

As appealing as Clive Owen seems to be (he was set to be the next Bond at one stage, remember?) he is like you seem him in any other movie; nothing out of the ordinary for him here. And for those who are fans of Naomi Watts, you’ll be disappointed as you’ll have a hard time finding her on screen at all; the least work done by a leading lady and second headline name in a while I reckon.

The rest of the cast are solid without being spectacular. Most I imagine are European actors and I’ve never heard of them, so that helped a little with authenticity factor of the accents and characters.

Tom Tykwer is a very hit and miss director. When he stays within his limits or has decent material to work with (Run Lola Run and Perfume) he is great. This might be borderline; attempts to have the pace that Lola had but like I said it just deters it from the storytelling. It really is a wannabe movie. The music at certain points will remind you of a Bourne movie and they even use the same stretch of Road in Italy, as seen in the opening sequence of Quantum of Solace.

You might be inclined to see it if you are a Clive Owen fan but be warned. If you’ve seen the trailer, not only have you been deceived (because it did look good), you have also pretty much seen the entire movie.

40%

Movie Review: Doubt

DOUBT
Main Players: Meryl Streep, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams, et al.
Calling the shots: John Patrick Shanley
Running time: 104mins
What's it about? Set in 1964, Doubt centres on a nun who confronts a priest after suspecting him of abusing a black student. He denies the charges, and much of the play’s quick-fire dialogue tackles themes of religion, morality and authority. - from imdb.com

What did I think? I’m not sure I like this movie. And that could be because it felt more like a play than a movie. It’s definitely a picture that relies heavily on the performances of its cast, as the interaction between them is what drives this movie. And in that sense this movie has succeeded by casting some fantastic actors.

The movie was written for the screen and directed by the man who wrote the play itself (Shanley). You can’t help but feel that he needed to give the directing duties, at least, to an established director. As I mentioned, it feels very much like a play and it isn’t helped by the direction. Unlike Frost/Nixon which was also based on a play, there is too much emphasis on the dialogue between characters rather than each scene as a whole.

The performances are outstanding, if not all that spectacular, as each play characters that seem to come easy to them. They all definitely deserve their nominations for Oscars but I doubt any of them will win…no puns intended. Streep is in full flight bitch mode and only someone of Hoffman’s caliber can stand toe-to-toe, though at times he is outshone. Amy Adams plays the naïve young nun well and Viola Davis as the conflicted mother.

Without the performances though, the film doesn’t have much to stand on. Once the suspicion is raised, it becomes a battle between a head strong nun and a legitimately caring priest. We never truly find out if he did it or not, but that never is the issue here. The film tries to state the power of having “doubt” about anything you believe in, be that a person, religion, or otherwise.

It’s a message that gets through but you really don’t see the point of it. Appreciate this for what it is. A strong character driven play with some impressive performances and you might enjoy it. Otherwise, there’s not much to take note here. A good piece of work for all involved, but nothing they will be remembered for.

50%

Movie Review: Changeling

CHANGELING
Main Players: Angelina Jolie, John Malkovich, Michael Kelly, et al.
Calling the shots: Clint Eastwood
Running time: 141mins
What's it about? A mother’s (Jolie) prayer for her kidnapped son to return home is answered, though it doesn’t take long for her to suspect the boy who came back is not hers. – from imdb.com

What did I think? It was very interesting to see two Clint Eastwood directed features so close to each other. They tell a very different tale, at a very different time, yet they both have the same unmistakable feel to them. The grainy, almost colour fade, blue wash screen that you see is almost his trademark as most of his films are about something tragic or emotional.

It is amazing how seamlessly Clint takes you back to the 20s. The decadence feel is definitely there and the backdrop, almost picture-like, is a fine touch to the unique, almost dream like setting we are brought back to.

Getting the best out of his actors is what Clint certainly does in a majority of his films. Hilary Swank, Morgan Freeman and Sean Penn have all benefited from his direction. And in this case, Angelina Jolie is fantastic as the mother who never gives up finding her son, no matter what obstacles she comes across. You can argue that it is most definitely tailor-made for her to succeed. The role is so beefy and emotion charged, it’s what every actor should thrive on.

The other actors do a fine job as well, especially Jason Butler Harner (who plays Northcott) and Jeffrey Donovan (who plays Capt. JJ Jones). These two in particular perform in such a way that it draws out the right kind of emotion from us, the audience. Northcott turns out to be a frighteningly weird character and you literally just want to slap Jones in the face. In contrast, John Malkovich, though important in his role, was completely underutilized and looked like he always wanted more things to do.

As with Clint’s previous features, this leads you in one direction and completely throws you in another with a massive plot development. It is based on a true story, but how much of it really is factual is anyone’s guess.

Regardless, if catches the outrageous 20s well and leaves you with his trademark emotional ending which is neither happy nor sad but hopeful.

60%

Movie Review: Gran Torino

GRAN TORINO
Main Players: Clint Eastwood, Christopher Carley, Bee Vang, et al.
Calling the shots: Clint Eastwood
Running time: 116mins
What's it about? Disgruntled Korean War veteran Walt Kowalski (Clint Eastwood) sets out to reform his neighbour, a young Hmong teenager, who tried to steal Kowalski’s prized possession: his 1972 Gran Torino. – from imdb.com

What did I think? Leave it to Clint to get the best out of himself. In years gone by most of his films successes have come because he does such a wonderful job in them himself. He is a fantastic director with a certain feel to his movies that is undeniable, but you often forget that he is also a screen veteran with such presence on screen; he is a joy to watch.

Although for most of the film, it seems like he is just angry and growling all the time, you can’t understate that performance. He has the right balance of showing disdain for the world, the world that’s changing all the time around him, and showing his softer side when he takes Thao under his wings. He still yells insults at him, but you know there’s nothing to it.

That’s where the surprising humour of the movie exists as well. Kowalski’s continuous racially charged insults becoming increasingly funny as we know he says them much like mates bad mouthing each other. And Clint does well to deliver these lines and he doesn’t discriminate, he hates everyone.

It’s a shame then that the films weaknesses are its most important parts. The gang in comparison seems very one note and stereotypical. They aren’t Hmong gangs as much as they are Asians-in-black-clothing gangs. The young actors that try to keep up with Clint on screen at times fall terribly with Bee Vang (who played Thao) particularly terrible in one scene.

Regardless, the film is touching and particularly relevant in the multicultural world that we live in, though it might be slightly dated. It would have felt more at home, had it come about ten years earlier.

It is surprising to see that it didn’t garner many, if any, nominations or awards. Clint surely deserved it for his understated direction. As I said he brings a certain feel to it; something almost foreboding. You can definitely feel the emotional end coming but in what way? …you’ll just have to see to find out.

70%

Movie Review: Milk

MILK
Main Players: Sean Penn, Emile Hirsch, Josh Brolin, et al.
Calling the shots: Gus Van Sant
Running time: 128mins
What's it about? Based on the true story of openly gay politician Harvey Milk; his life, rise in the political world and his tragic end. It’s US in the 1970’s and the discriminations against them are obvious and wide spread. Yet he remains positive and strives to rises up against all odds to stand up for the rights of all.

What did I think? In the movie industry’s silly season, these gems start popping up every where. It’s a shame that the like of this and Frost/Nixon aren’t getting the wide spread releases that they deserve because unlike other these movies are worth your time.

Again it’s based on historical events so seeing it brought to life in such a magnificent fashion adds to the films achievements. The realness we feel due to the direction and performances delivered in this film are second to none and with such an engaging story, for all its money you’d expect to be depressing, is actually uplifting and very enjoyable.

Sean Penn, I must admit, I think often overacts. He is great but sometimes he will just do that little bit too much to draw attention. Not so in this one. The mannerisms and speech patterns are near on perfect and, though I doubt he’ll win an Oscar for it, deserve all the praise. As does the rest of the cast Hirsch, Franco, Brolin all do a fantastic job with only Diego Luna being the weak-link.

Their incredible performances as emphasized at the end of the film when we see snippets of the real people the cast members were portraying and how close they had come to bring them to life. Some of it is just simply uncanny.

It does have its flaws though. They could have explored more about Harvey Milk the person and not the later parts of his career. But that would be considered a minor detail given how well constructed the rest of the film is. It’s also quite funny in some parts showing that lighter side of an otherwise hard life he lived.

Milk is probably not going to win the Oscar this year; because of both its gay-overtones and the quality of the rest of the field. However it is a movie you should definitely see. If nothing else for Sean Penn and the rest of the casts performance but it truly is an enjoyable film. And let’s face it, that’s why we go to the movies right?

80%

Movie Review: Revolutionary Road

REVOLUTIONARY ROAD
Main Players: Leonardo DiCaprio, Kate Winslet, Michael Shannon, et al.
Calling the shots: Sam Mendes
Running time: 119mins
What's it about? A young couple living in the suburbs ‘seemingly’ living the “All-American dream”, struggle to come to terms with their personal issues and aspirations as they try to raise their family. What follows is a tragic sequence of realizations and events that change their lives forever.

What did I think? You come out of this movie feeling really numb. Not because it’s particularly boring, or bad, or enjoyable. But because it’s a movie that really doesn’t go any where and has a very depressing ending. You come out wondering, “What the fuck…”

It’s certainly a movie that relies heavily on the performances and direction.

You really have to appreciate the performances. Leo is at his dramatic best, literally wearing his emotions on his sleeves, swinging from happy to angry but also still able to be charming. Kate is also at her best, having the more difficult role of the two. She also brings the emotions out, almost underplaying it, keeping you wondering how she is really feeling. Michael Shannon is the surprise performer here, stealing all his scenes playing the ex- mental patient who shatters their world (he is also quite good in “Bug”. Check it out).

The directing is wonderful as well. The flawless execution transport you right back into the States in 50’s (not that I know what that was like). The music is somber yet appropriate for what is going. Mendes uses some lingering shots to emphasis points well and leaves you with some lasting imagines.

The problem with the movie, and a big one at that, is that other than the two leads trading blows in the form of verbal fights they continue to have, the movie does nothing. You literally see them fall in love, fight, make-up, fight, make-up, fight and so on. Then you see the dissatisfaction in their lives and actions they take because of it…it’s just not a fun movie.

I take back what I said; this movie is rather uneventful and is quite boring. Other than appreciate the masters in their craft at their best, it’s a movie you can forget. Some said it’s what would have happened if the two had survived the “Titanic”. If that’s the case, then I’m glad it sank because they would have had depressing lives.

40%

Movie Review: Role Models

ROLE MODELS
Main Players: Paul Rudd, Seann William Scott, Elizabeth Banks, et al.
Calling the shots: David Wain
Running time: 99mins
What's it about? After getting in trouble with the law following a bad day, instead of serving time in jail, they are sentenced to 150hours of community service. It comes in the form of Sturdy Wings a Big Brother program. Let the fun begin.

What did I think? Absolutely hilarious! This is the stuff comedies should be made of. You get exactly what you paid for in this very formula tic but consistently funny movie.

Nothing about this movie is “new” per se. You’ve seen this movie before. So much so that you can easily see the structure of it and where it is ultimately heading. But none of that really matter because they make up for it with great heart and laugh out loud moments over and over again. There is only ever a lull in proceeding due to the expected “turmoil” that always happens but it doesn’t last long.

This mostly in part thanks to the tight plot. With all the talk about bullshit, there really is none. So the pacing of the film is good and as I said the jokes keep on coming.

It also comes in many forms. The two leads, Rudd and Scott, share great chemistry and comedic timing. Their bickering and childish fighting even seems natural and funny. Then you have the two kids, “McLovin” and the black kid, who make you laugh in their own ways (nerdish and swearing kid). You also have great supporting talent, especially in the form of Jane Lynch, as the BS talking former coke addict guidance counselor. She probably takes the cake for the best lines in the movie.

It’s not a “good” movie in the traditional sense, but it is great value for money and one of the better comedies around. If you’re out for a laugh, you won’t be disappointed. It’s like “Superbad”-lite in terms of the humour but no where near as crude…or gross.

A fresh, consistent and incredibly hilarious comedy disguised as a typical run of the mill comedy. Catch it before it finishes…or at least on DVD once it comes out.

80%

Movie Review: Valkyrie

VALKYRIE
Main Players: Tom Cruise, Kenneth Branagh, Bill Nighy, et al.
Calling the shots: Bryan Singer
Running time: 120mins
What's it about? Not everyone in Germany agreed with Hitler during the Second World War. In fact, there were more than 20 known attempts on his life from within. This is the story about the last attempt. We know what happens, but at least they tried.

What did I think? More than anything else, this is a very interesting movie in terms of its story line. History buffs will lap it up. Unfortunately for the movie, it never out does its subject matter making this movie more intriguing rather than great…or even (barely) good.

I can’t emphasis the story enough. It really is fascinating. We all knew the world hated Hitler, but to know it came so close to ending for him from within is truly amazing. At least not all of Germany agreed with his ways and that’s probably a stereotype and hence why they are so apologetic about the past. It’s a shame then, that this movie didn’t have the feel, the “umph” that films like this should have.

It all comes down to two things: the casting and the directing.

The cast, asides from Tom Cruise, is a powerhouse British cast if ever I saw one. Cruise is in a controlled acting mode here but you can’t help but feel as though he wants to break out, Tom Cruise-Style! He probably couldn’t have a better supporting cast around him, with everyone playing their roles well. But why the British cast playing Germans? They’ve completely ditched the concept of accents, and rather than speaking in a German accent, or even in a neutral one, they speak in a British one. That kind of threw me off. They also start with Cruise speaking in German but quickly ditch it for American English.

As much as I love Bryan Singers work, this isn’t his type of movie. He creates a stylish, well presented Hollywood blockbuster but nothing more. You can’t help but feel that in better hands, we’d be talking about Oscars for this thing. Say…if Spielberg directed it (not that he’d ever direct a movie about the Nazis).

As the movie rolls on, you can forgive the accents and enjoy the tense thriller-aspect of the movie. We all know the outcome, but it doesn’t make it any less compelling. It just won’t leave you as satisfied as it should.

60%

Movie Review: Bride Wars

BRIDE WARS
Main Players: Kate Hudson, Anne Hathaway, Candice Bergen, et al.
Calling the shots: Gary Winick
Running time: 94mins
What's it about? Two best friends, Liv and Emma, who are both set to get married, book the town’s best wedding planner. Unfortunately, their weddings are booked on the same day, at the same time, at the same place. Neither is willing to sacrifice their day for the other. Let the war begin.

What did I think? Anyone who knows me well knows that I like my fair share of romcoms and chick flicks. I can even take them romantic dramas and tear-jerkers. But this…this is just pure rubbish. And it is somewhat of a shame because both Hudson and Hathaway are appealing in normal circumstances.

Where to start…a movie like this really is made for chicks. Yet in usual chick flick fair, there is at least some appeal for the blokes that get dragged into it. Whether it be: attractive leads (check) or a decent amount of laughs that they can relate to (big fat cross) or is even slightly funny (a bigger fat cross). This has zero appeal and therefore quickly became a very painful experience.

Hudson and Hathaway are as advertised. Both a beautiful and they can both carry a movie. They do the very best that they can with what they have to work with in terms of the plot, because it isn’t very good. Candice Bergen (from TV’s Boston Legal) is on cruise control, doing not much at all. And there’s hardly anyone else in this movie of note.

The other thing is that, all the male characters look the same. And asides from the three main blokes, the others all seemed gay…but that could just be my boredom playing up.

The plot tries to keep it interesting with some plot turns and character developments, which if anything, seem completely out of place and totally misguided. It needed to end somehow and what they came up with is a bit of a muddled mess.

There are a few moments that show some potential but that is very short lived and returns to its true self, a complete dribble. I initially thought this movie would do well, but after having sat through it (I wanted to see Role Models dammit, but I was out voted), I’d be surprised if this even hits the top three range. See it at your own peril.

20%

Movie Review: The Wrestler

THE WRESTLER
Main Players: Mickey Rourke, Marisa Tomei, Evan Rachel Wood, et al.
Calling the shots: Darren Aronofsky
Running time: 115mins
What's it about? Randy “The Ram” Robinson is washed up. He has passed his “best before” date and wrestles on weekends to (barely) make ends meet. When health issues become a factor, he must choose between making amends with the people in his life and living life, or go for the ultimate glory in one final bout.

What did I think? Please welcome, from the depth of obscurity and time wasted on misguided pursuits, Mickey Rourke! Last seen in “Sin City” (which was good) but pretty much in acting purgatory before that, he has well and truly returned in grand fashion and has a Gold Globe to prove it.

The movie itself is not out of the ordinary. Actually, if anything, it’s a fairly standard drama that is rather depressing if you think about Randy’s missed opportunities and errors of his ways. Just when things start looking good for him, he blows it by falling back into bad habits and then is unable to get out again. You really can’t blame him for the decisions he makes and is all the more sympathetic for it.

Mickey’s performance though will quite literally blow you away. He certainly looks the part (of a wrestler), but it’s the emotion he brings to the screen. He is a beaten down piece of meat and he knows it (he wears hearing aids when he’s not wrestling for Christ sake). When he makes his final speech (apparently self penned) it’s almost like his talking about himself and it is very heartfelt.

The film is also made very stylishly. Almost like a documentary/behind the scenes type effect. It shows complete appreciation for the sport of pro wrestling and any wrestling fan will appreciate the detail and honesty that is brought to the screen (see things like the comradely in the locker room, the blading techniques, etc.) but it never overshadows the movie itself.

The other two actors of note, Tomei and Wood are also quite fantastic. Tomei playing a stripper and possibly he’s only friend, literally bares all and is a constant support. Wood, playing the estranged daughter is equal parts angry and longing for that father figure.

It’s not a happy film. But it’s a film you can most definitely enjoy; from the opening scene to the emotion-filled end. You’ll be in for a ride.

80%

Movie Review: Bedtime Stories

BEDTIME STORIES
Main Players: Adam Sandler, Keri Russell, Russell Brand, et al.
Calling the shots: Adam Shankman
Running time: 99mins
What's it about? Skeeter’s grown up in the hotel business. He is a maintenance man but dreams of being more. When he has to look after his nephew and niece for the week, he tells them bedtime stories that, as strange as they are, begin coming true. He tries to manipulate the stories to his benefit with funny consequences.

What did I think? He mentioned on Letterman that he wanted to make a film that his children could watch and it’s safe to say Adam Sandler has succeeded in doing that. It’s not going to blow anyone out of the water but it’s a most fun and enjoyable family film.

It has an amazing premise. The stuff you literally dream about as a child. What you make up starts coming true, how awesome is that?! They use that to full effect and the creative juices continue to flow. Mind you, they use every cliché in the book (medieval, cowboy, space) but it will definitely entertain kids and parents a like.

The list of actors is great. Adam Sandler does a toned down version of himself but still feels comfortable enough. Russell Brand is hilarious as his best friend. The random outburst and the general weirdness he has will have you laughing each time he is on screen. Guy Pearce and Lucy Lawless play the villainous roles, and you can’t help but wonder what Pearce is doing in a film like this but he does a decent job. Rob Schneider also makes his usual “you can do it” type-cameo.

It’s also entertaining to see the various actors in the various roles, depending on the fantasy sequence and if they look at all uncomfortable, at least they look like they are having fun doing it.

I’ve grown out of kids/family movies (so I keep telling myself, but not animations. Never animations…) but this is quite fun and entertaining. It’s definitely funny enough and will only slightly bore you. Bugsy summarises the movie well, cute and amusing but by the end you’re glad it’s over.

Mainly for Sandler fans and those kids inside us; it’s not particularly good but not a complete waste either.

60%

Movie Review: Frost/Nixon

FROST/NIXON
Main Players: Frank Langella, Michael Sheen, Sam Rockwell, et al.
Calling the shots: Ron Howard
Running time: 122mins
What's it about? After the Watergate scandal that forced President Nixon to resign, the whole of America (and the world) was waiting for an explanation; the truth. It never came. British TV presenter, David Frost gets an interview with the former president to see if he can get the answer the people so desperately want.

What did I think? I know the year is still young but here is the first best movie for 2009! I expect this movie to rake in some awards come this award season and it will be worthy of it.

You hear the premise (two guys talking) and it doesn’t seem all that thrilling. Trust me when I tell you, this is so much more than that. Though the inevitable face-off is what you’re waiting to see, everything around the interview (the lead-up, aftermath) plays just a vital and integral part of the film. If you are even slightly interested in one of the biggest events in our history this is a must see.

Mind you, that doesn’t mean you need to know what ‘Watergate’ actually means. There is enough background and you’ll get the gist of the situation.

The movie itself is almost flawless. Top-to-bottom, it is made so well you have to appreciate Ron Howard and the job his done here. Adapted from a stage play, the dialogue and plot is always engaging. There’s also a nice even flow to proceedings meaning it never lags and there is a lot of surprising humour amongst the drama, ensuring you are never bored.

Langella (nominated for a Golden Globe) embodies Nixon completely. Though not looking like him, he definitely plays the part. Sheen, Rockwell, Platt, Bacon, the list of talent roles on. There is no one that lets this film down and it is made all the more impressive with the fact that they are playing real life characters.

The film has almost a “making of” feel to it; with interviews with the characters thrown in to enhance the narrative. As I mentioned earlier though the interview itself is the main event and as it is described in the movie, it’s almost like a boxing match, the two combatants trading blows.

This movie is sure to leave a lasting impression as Nixon’s amazing revelation does. You’ll need to go on a hunt but it’d be a crying shame to miss this movie.

100%

Movie Review: Yes Man

YES MAN
Main Players: Jim Carrey, Zooey Deschanel, Bradley Cooper, et al.
Calling the shots: Peyton Reed
Running time: 104mins
What's it about? Simple, really. Carl plays life safe by saying “no” to almost every opportunity given to him. He is persuaded to attend an almost cult-like seminar, where saying “yes” is to live your life. He decides to give it a go with some funny outcomes and surprising results but as all comedies go, it starts to bite him back.

What did I think? This is vintage Jim Carrey. It’s almost has a nostalgic feel. His last physical comedy effort came in 05 with “Fun with Dick and Jane”, so it’s been a long time between drinks and it’s good to see a man do what he does best.

Obviously though, there’s a problem that lies there as well. As inspired as the initial idea for the movie is (a no man becomes a yes man) the movie falls back into the trap of becoming a very familiar, a much repeated, formulaic comedy; relying heavily on Carrey’s rubbery face and physical craziness to create the laughs, rather than the funny situations that it starts out with.

Having said that though, there are plenty of laughs to be had and at its very best, it’s absolutely hilarious (Deschanel’s band’s lyrics are hilarious). But the turning point half way through the movie feels very forced and because of that it loses the momentum it had created.

It has a fantastic cast of comedic actors. Rhys Darby steals most of his scenes as his nerdy boss; John Michael Higgins does his usual obsessed/crazed act, “That 70’s Show” alum Danny Masterson essentially plays Hyde. It’s also good to see Bradley Cooper in a non-asshole role and Zooey Deschanel is, as usual, her kooky, adorable self. Terence Stamp is awesome as the cult leader and seems to be having fun playing it manically.

There is a lot going for this movie. And it’s almost a step away from becoming something special. If only the Hollywood honchos weren’t so afraid to let it loose. Instead you get a re-cycled comedy that is, as funny as it is, very tired and very, very safe.

It is worthy of your time if you want to laugh but not much else; enjoyable enough without doing much else for you.

60%

Movie Review: Seven Pounds

SEVEN POUNDS
Main Players: Will Smith, Rosario Dawson, Woody Harrelson, et al.
Calling the shots: Gabriele Muccino
Running time: 123mins
What's it about? An IRS agent with a tragic past and a fateful secret is on an extraordinary journey of redemption by forever changing the lives seven random strangers, who are all decent people in unfortunate circumstances.

What did I think? To give away any more of the plot will give away the movie so a short and sweet description this time. And much like the trailer, the first half of the movie is just as ambiguous and mysterious as it can get.

This movie is literally like a really good poker player. It plays its cards really close to its chest and you can’t tell what is really going on until it decides to show its hand. The beauty of it though, is that with its performances and direction, the intrigue is definitely there and you may not know what is going on exactly, but you know it’s big and so you’re dying to find out.

Everything leading up to the climax is built up and constructed so well, that once all is finally revealed, it is done so spectacularly well. It is both very touchingly and very satisfyingly.

Hollywood’s ‘Mr. Money-in-the-Bank’ Smith is back on his drama ground here, re-teaming with his “Pursuit of Happyness” director, he at times feels awkward but settles right in as the movie goes on. The supporting cast do a marvelous job also, particularly Rosario Dawson (her second time with Smith), who I’ve never seen in a better role than this. Woody and Barry Pepper also bring some experience and emotion to their roles as required.

Regular movie goers be warned. It’s not your typical movie. As I mentioned, in the first half of the movie not a whole lot is revealed. Like a 5000 piece jigsaw, the picture comes clearer slowly. Stay focused and you’ll enjoy the breakthrough. There is enough intrigue to keep you interested…I hope.

For those playing at home; yes, Will gets topless. Yes, he has a shower scene. And yes, he runs a lot. Three things he seems to always do in his movies lately.

It’s a step in a completely different direction from “Hancock” but it’s a good step. Stick with this movie to the end and it’s sure to reward you. I’m a Will Smith fan (but who isn’t?) so I may be slightly biased but I enjoyed this film.

80%

Movie Review: Marley & Me

MARLEY & ME

Main Players: Owen Wilson, Jennifer Aniston, Eric Dane, et al.

Calling the shots: David Frankel

Running time: 120mins

What's it about? John and Jen has just gotten married. They've just moved into their first home and both have comfy jobs (if it's not doing exactly what they would like). They are ready for the next step, but before children, they decide to get a pup. Little do they know, they are about to pick up a "clearance puppy" that will change their lives forever. Cue the laughter, love and the inevitable.

What did I think? This one is a little hit and miss for my liking. I've revealed that I'm a big kid at heart. But I also enjoy my fair share of rom-coms and just romantic dribble in general (who didn't ball their eyes out in "The Notebook", c'mon!).

It's a more mature romantic/comedy/drama and it's not funny enough for an Owen Wilson movie and too tear-jerky for a Jennifer Aniston movie. Irony is, as sad as the ending is, you are given plenty of time to prepare for it because you know it's coming.

Owen Wilson and Jennifer Aniston do share a nice chemistry and it's part of the reason this movie is watchable. Fans of either won't be too disappointed with their efforts unless you are particularly after the stereotypes I mentioned before. They are well supported by some strong actors, non bigger than Alan Arkin who continues his dive into comedies (more or less) with success. Eric Dane is also good as the guy Owen Wilson's character "could have been" and dog trainer Kathleen Turner literally steal the scene with her (now) "plus-size" frame.

But the real stars of the movie are the dogs (I've been told 22 of them) that play the role of Marley. Incredibly adorably cute as a pup, huge and destructive but also caring as a full grown and old and ready to go later on. Marley literally is the heart of the movie and it's often his antics that will make you laugh, smile and cry through out the movie. He literally is the world's worst dog you'll ever love.

The movie does drag in parts. With a massive running time for this kind of movie, it almost out stays it's welcome. But thankfully, for the most part it's well handle by all involved.

#1 with a bullet in the US, it's unlikely it'll repeat that kind of success in Australia but it's a safe movie to take your date to...or your dog.

50%

Movie Review: Bolt

BOLT
Main Players: (voices of) John Travolta, Miley Cyrus, Susie Essman, et al.
Calling the shots: Byron Howard & Chris Williams
Running time: 96mins
What's it about? Raised on a TV set, Bolt thinks everything he does on TV he can actually do. When his owner Penny is kidnapped on the show, Bolt escapes from the studios to save her. He soon learns the rough ways of the real world and instead learns to be a normal dog. With the help of a streetwise cat and a manic fan hamster, he makes his way home.

What did I think? I’ve said recently that I love my animations, so this one was a no brainer for me to see. Unfortunately I didn’t see it in 3D (I still want to, so let me know if anyone wants to) because in 3D it probably would have been better.

As enjoyable as this was, it was a little disappointing to find that the laughs weren’t as consistent. From the trailers, I expected it to be funny all the way through and though the funny moments are hilarious, they were too far in between for my liking. It instead settled comfortably into the usual family-oriented entertainment that Disney can now produce with their eyes closed.

Having said that, it starts with a BANG! The opening sequence of the actual show within-the-movie is incredibly exciting. It’d be a show I’d definitely watch. So compared to this explosive start, the rest of the movie feels a little slower but as I mentioned before is a well told story much in the vain of ‘The Incredibles’.

They have also perfected the art of cuteness. Little Bolt is absolutely adorable and when he learns to be a dog by doing the “puppy-dog eyes” it is cute and funny at the same time. The animation itself is incredible and attention to detail is insane. See the way the pigeons talk and move; it’s spotless.

John Travolta does well as the voice of Bolt as does the rest of the cast, who are all cast perfectly. Though Miley is probably a little underutilized, except for the obvious song that she is probably forced to sing for the soundtrack. The hamster probably steals most of the movie, though most of his funny lines are given away in the trailer.

It’s a safe crowd pleaser that doesn’t try to do anything it can’t. So as a side effect, it won’t blow you away but will entertain you like only Disney animations can and you will also walk away being a fan of BOLT!

60%